The New York Times published an opinion piece recently (4/12/2015) headlined "Unsafe and Unsound Banks", but it doesn't take too much imagination to spot the equal threat to credit unions - except the threat is greater!
One classic example of "a derivative" ... |
This time the well-qualified critic of derivatives is
none other than Mr. Thomas Hoenig, current Vice-Chair of the FDIC and former long-term Federal Reserve president [Mr. Metsger is his equal on the NCUA Board]. Based on the just completed Fed stress tests, all TBTF banks passed with an average capital level of 12.9%. Not so cautions Mr. Hoenig, who has released data which shows "those same banks actually averaged 4.97% capital at the end of 2014." Not exactly a minor ["robust"] rounding error...
Mr. Hoenig |
"History favors Mr. Hoenig's approach. Gains and losses may be offsetting when the economy is stable, but in the financial crisis American taxpayers were forced to hand the banks tens of billions of dollars to make good on derivative bets gone bad."
Not all federal government agencies are "fully adept"... |
The greater risk to credit unions than banks? Based on the corporate debacle and recent capital/risk (RBC) snafus, it seems apparent that NCUA does not have the expertise to either effectively assess nor intelligently monitor derivatives. Unsure? Why not ask NCUA to disclose its derivatives expert(s?), credentials, and experience?
After all, they are playing with your money....
2 comments:
Mr. Metsger may have the same title as Mr. Hoenig but he is not his equal.
Is the answer---Larry?
Post a Comment