Friday, November 21, 2014

About The 2015 NCUA Budget...

No Cuts!
Well, in the federal regulatory, "Catch-22" world in which we all now exist, it is time for credit unions to study and comment upon the 2015 NCUA Budget, after that self-same budget has already been approved by the NCUA Board. That process, that logic, that obtuseness seems to make great sense on Duke Street, Alexandria.  In other parts of the Country, it's called arrogance ("Let them eat cake!" - Marie Antionette).


No comments!
But, since we are all just getting a first look at the budget and the underlying numbers, believe it would be fair to look first to what the NCUA Chair says about the budget and the processes by which it was developed.  You can find Ms. Matz' narrative on the 2015 NCUA Budget at www.ncua.gov under "About NCUA", 2015 Budget Documents. Read it and weep.


No clue!
Would suggest that of the many "unusual" comments and "twisted" explanations which are put forth as justification of the 2015 NCUA budget, the following logical disconnect between Duke Street Fantasyland and the real world says it all:



"Cutting the budget, however, is not an option.  Like all businesses, this Agency faces non-discretionary costs that tend to increase each year, such as:

                         *  Health care;
                         *  Travel and hotels;
                         *  Telecommunications;
                         *  Leased and owned property;
                         *  Hardware and software; and
                         *  Maintenance and repairs.


So the only way to materially cut the budget would be to substantially cut staff."

- Chair Debbie Matz 
On the 2015 NCUA budget
November 20, 2015


Yep, that certainly sums up pretty well all the very difficult choices that many credit unions - "like all businesses" - have had to make over the last five years.  Most of us didn't realize that looking at cuts in healthcare, travel, telecom, maintenance, and staff were "non-discretionary". Not sure how credit unions go about correcting this sort of statement of financial, fiscal insanity, but perhaps there is hope in that there was one dissenting budget vote on the Board.

But for now, we must all evidently accept the embarrassment of a federal financial Agency budget in which the Agency tries to have its...



... and eat us too!!




[... any way you slice it, you just can't cut it !!!]





















9 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's easy to spend other people's money!

Anonymous said...

It is the arrogance caused by an unchallenged ability to tax the members of credit unions.

What is most concerning is that the Harsh Mistress will say incompetent things like this with the belief that there is some actual rational justification for her outrageous claim!

Anonymous said...

SING TO THE TUNE OF "MR. SANDMAN"

Madam Chairman you gave me a budget
You made it the largest I've ever seen
You added more positions that were not needed
And you tell the industry it's still not over

Madam Chairman I am so sad
My regulator is raving mad
Please turn off the money drain
Madam Chairman you are driving me insane

Madam Chairman give me a budget
Make it the smallest I've ever seen
Take out the bloat and all the fat
And I will be your buddy after that

Madam Chairman you still have time
Stop taking our nickels and our dimes
If you want love and praise
Give us a few happy days

Madam Chairman soon you will leave
Some will be happy some will be pleased
If you want to go out a winner
Give us a budget that let's us afford to buy our dinner

Anonymous said...

China's central bank just took action to reduce their interest rates. Seriously doubt that the Federal Reserve will increase rates anytime soon! Ms. Matz could start the substantial staff cuts with reductions coming from the Office of the Robust Economists!

She could abandon the RBC regulation and drop substantial number of over paid attorneys.

Just several easy staff cuts. The cuts would be easy to identify if she had any real world experience in budgeting!

Anonymous said...

Regulatory capture; defined, the act or acts of a financial regulatory to impede the ability of a financial institution to grow and operate as a business; to hinder with excessive rules; to oversee as a Monarch, King or Queen and treat everyone as their subjects; see NCUA.

Anonymous said...

Memo to all CUNA members: Congress will not be in session during GAC. Therefore, a March on NCUA headquarters will be held everyday. Make your signs, bring comfortable shoes and be ready to walk. Details will follow. For those of you who do not remember, for some odd reason, NCUA is located in Alexandria, VA not in DC. Out of sight out of mind? No way baby. We are marching on the monarchy!

Anonymous said...

NCUA is in no danger of this: "Regulatory capture is a form of political corruption that occurs when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or special concerns of interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating." Effectively, they listen to no one!

Anonymous said...

NCUA could save the most by eliminating their economist! Wrong, wrong, wrong....take whatever he says and reverse it. Rates Up? No rates Down. Cu's should go short? No - go long and prosper. Even a broken watch is more accurate than him (correct twice a day). He's been right, when?

Political Patriot said...

NCUA screwed up in 2007/2008 when they failed to accept federal bailout money. This poor decision harmed credit union income for many years and garnered little or not political benefit. As a result the NCUA just takes more and more include
from credit unions. NCUA needs new leadership, a leadership of 5 not just 3. NCUA is too tied to politics, not enough tied to its owners, credit unions.