![]() |
Jumping into the "Wild NCUA Yonder? |
![]() |
Robustly essential or essentially robust? |
(think "jumbo shrimp", "pretty ugly", "Holy war", "educational TV", "working committee", "non-essential government employee","Rapid City, S.D."!) will be able to "copy off the paper" of its compadres over at the FDIC and OCC.
Unfortunately, in looking at NCUA's draft
![]() |
Less weight, more fat? |
The FDIC/OCC rules give a 0% risk rating for:
"Direct and unconditional claims on the U.S. government, its central bank, or a U.S. government agency."
Very logical and rational - right? Well, if you take a look at the inner workings of that cute little, on-line "NCUA risk calculator"; it would appear that "the Agency robusterians" have imposed a 20% risk rating on all CU deposits with the FRB!
Of course this in line with NCUA's "Chicken Little" view - not under oath and not before Congress - that interest rates are poised to soar for credit unions, despite the statements by Bernanke/Yellen - under oath and before Congress - that rates will remain low for an extended period of time and for certain through 2015. But what does the FED know?!?
For at least one credit union with which I am familiar, that "fat finger" or logical robusterian error reduces its RBC by almost 20% - not exactly a minor matter.
![]() |
Quack? |
For at least one credit union with which I am familiar, that "fat finger" or logical robusterian error reduces its RBC by almost 20% - not exactly a minor matter.
CREDIT UNIONS NEED TO BE VIGILANT AND BEWARE!
NCUA's "EVERYONE PASSES" CAPITAL HYPE IS.. JUST THAT!
2 comments:
Effective Regulator!!!!!!!
Not only should we all submit comments, we should send seperate comments for each major area, otherwise you would be submitting a book. And, have senior staff weigh in too. Their opinions matter too.
Birddog
Post a Comment